Information: U.S. Federal Judge and Epic Games Challenge Whether Apple is Compliant with Order to permit Payment Steering
A hearing on the Epic Games v. Apple trial will decide if Apple truly has followed its U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers' order that allows app developers to "steer" users towards payments from third party vendors that are not available in the App Store's native App Store.
The hearing on the subsequent conformity of Apple began on Wednesday, May 8. AP reports that judge Gonzalez Rogers " questioned whether Apple has set up an array of obstacles to hinder payments using different payment methods inside iPhone apps" in spite of the court's directive.
Hearing is focused on the question of Apple Policy Is Still Anti-Steering
The AP article also explains Judge Gonzalez Rogers' tone suggested Apple's decisions have been focused in preserving the company's profits rather than submitting with intent to allow steering. decision to let steering be allowed and improve iPhone customers' ability to easily switch to other available payment methods in the app. This article explains that, according to Epic document, Apple is still blocking developers from redirecting customers to alternative payment options with cheaper pricing choices.
The AP report continues to say that in the course of the hearing Apple CEO of the iPhone App Store, Matthew Fischer revealed that Apple had only accepted and approved 38 apps with links to other payment systems, "a fraction of the around 2 million iPhone apps that are available within the U.S."
PC Mag points out that the small number of applications (38 out of 65,000 developers of apps that offer in-app purchases) is likely due to cost, since the 27 percentage Apple charges plus the cost of charges imposed by credit cards would likely result in a higher overall cost to developers.
Apple Executive 'Unaware' of Higher Overall Cost Issue
An LAW360 story from Friday, May 10 recounts the day's activities that took place when Epic legal counsel Yonatan Even as well as the judge Gonzalez Rogers questioned Apple Finance Vice President Alex Roman. Even suggested the 3% lesser fee charged by Apple -- which amounts to 27 percent for transactions that take place inside an application not utilizing Apple devices, in contrast the usual cost of 30% -- and Epic have also provided proof that shows costs for services that are used to pay within the U.S. is 3.5% and also a yoga-related CEO who testified that they pay 3.5 percentage to 6.5 percent in fees for payment processing. After Roman said he was not aware of this fact, Even reiterated that the goal was to create the fee to allow companies to give users a better cost by requesting Roman whether he was aware of the fact. A judge Gonzalez Rogers is quoted as stating to Roman that "'It seems that you took many decisions while having little or no information or information,' she stated. "It seems to me like you were trying to protect ... the revenue from before.'" Read the LAW360 article here.
I'm happy to be able to that Judge Side with Epic
Chief Executive Chief Executive Officer David Nachman states that "We're happy to see that the judge siding in favor of Epic in this exchange We're hoping that this court can order Apple to make steering available to game and app developers without fees and unnecessary limits. The goal is to facilitate for worldwide commerce both for software and digital product firms. We join with our customers in celebrating the first step toward the free flow of commerce for mobile devices."
HTML1 Further Antitrust Affidavit Against Apple initiated by US Justice Department
In addition to being a participant in the Epic Games case and the Epic Games case, it was also involved in the Epic Games case. U.S. Justice Department launched an antitrust suit against Apple in the month of March 2024, alleging that Apple is the sole monopoly in the mobile market that is (among many other things) regarding electronic payments.
To find out more about HTML0 Click here to learn more about HTML0:
Related industry news and opinion:
About
Article was first seen on here